The Raid

When an FBI agent and an EPA scientist execute a surprise federal operation at Rocky Flats, their search for accountability uncovers a deliberately concealed cache of plutonium — and a decades-long strategy to bury what couldn’t be explained, threatening downwind communities and the investigators themselves.

See other logline suggestions

Overview

Poster
Unique Selling Point

The script for "The Raid" stands out for its timely exploration of environmental crimes and government cover-ups, set against the backdrop of a little-known but historically significant nuclear facility. The compelling characters, attention to technical detail, and suspenseful narrative make it a compelling and unique addition to the thriller genre, with the potential to captivate audiences interested in stories that blend real-world issues with high-stakes drama.

AI Verdict & Suggestions

Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.

Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries

GPT5
 Recommend
Gemini
 Highly Recommend
Grok
 Recommend
DeepSeek
 Recommend
Claude
 Recommend
Average Score: 8.6
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
To elevate the script's emotional depth and engagement, focus on amplifying the personal stakes for protagonists like Jack and Linda by making their health fears and backstories more immediate and integral to the plot, while deepening antagonist Tom Haskell's motivations to add nuance and complexity. Tighten mid-act pacing by interspersing exposition with action and emotional beats to maintain momentum, ensuring that character arcs build consistently toward clear decisions and resolutions.
For Executives:
The script has strong value as a prestige drama-thriller with a timely, true-story hook that could attract audiences interested in environmental conspiracies, similar to Chernobyl or The Wire, potentially leading to high engagement and series potential. However, risks include underdeveloped personal stakes that could result in emotional detachment, pacing issues in procedural sections that might bore viewers, and market challenges from sensitive real-world topics; without revisions to sharpen character depth and tighten flow, it may struggle to stand out in a crowded genre.
Story Facts
Genres:
Drama 40% Thriller 35% Crime 25%

Setting: 1957 and 1989, Rocky Flats Plant, Colorado

Themes: Concealment and Cover-Up, Corruption and Bureaucratic Inertia, Environmental Devastation and Health Risks, Pursuit of Justice and Truth, Personal Sacrifice and Risk, Control vs. Chaos, The Nature of Evidence and Proof, Disconnection and Isolation

Conflict & Stakes: The main conflict revolves around the investigation into environmental contamination at the Rocky Flats Plant, with high stakes involving public health, corporate secrecy, and potential legal repercussions.

Mood: Tense and foreboding

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The story is based on true events surrounding the Rocky Flats Plant, adding authenticity and urgency to the narrative.
  • Plot Twist: The discovery of a sealed airlock and undocumented contamination reveals systemic cover-ups within the facility.
  • Distinctive Setting: The juxtaposition of a serene suburban environment with the ominous presence of a nuclear facility creates a stark contrast.
  • Innovative Ideas: The screenplay explores the intersection of environmental science and legal drama, highlighting the complexities of regulatory oversight.

Comparable Scripts: Silkwood, The China Syndrome, A Civil Action, The Constant Gardener, Dark Waters, The Insider, Chernobyl (TV Mini-Series), Erin Brockovich, The Report

Script Level Analysis

Writer Exec

This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.

Screenplay Insights

Breaks down your script along various categories.

Overall Score: 7.68
Key Suggestions:
To improve the script from a creative standpoint, prioritize deepening the antagonist Tom Haskell's character by exploring his backstory and motivations, which will add layers to the conflict and make him a more engaging foil to the protagonists. Additionally, focus on tightening pacing in expository scenes to maintain tension and enhance emotional impact, ensuring that character development and plot progression feel dynamic and immersive.
Story Critique

Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.

Key Suggestions:
To refine this script, prioritize deepening character arcs, particularly for secondary figures like Tom Haskell, to add layers of complexity and motivation that heighten dramatic tension. Streamline pacing by reducing expository dialogue and incorporating more visual storytelling to maintain momentum and authenticity, ensuring the narrative's emotional core resonates more powerfully with audiences.
Characters

Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.

Key Suggestions:
The character analysis highlights opportunities to enhance the script by deepening emotional arcs and backstories for key characters like Linda and Tom, who have less dynamic transformations compared to Jack. Focusing on internal conflicts, such as Linda's anxiety and Tom's denial, can create more compelling character development, improve audience empathy, and strengthen thematic elements like environmental justice, ultimately making the narrative more engaging and less reliant on external plot drivers.
Emotional Analysis

Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.

Key Suggestions:
The script's emotional core is strong, with effective tension and empathy, but it risks audience fatigue due to a lack of variety and insufficient recovery time between intense scenes. To enhance craft, focus on adding moments of contrast, such as brief relief or character-driven interactions, to create emotional peaks and valleys, improving pacing and deepening audience connection without diluting the thriller's intensity.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.

Key Suggestions:
From a creative perspective, the script's strength lies in its thematic depth around ethical responsibility and truth versus deception, but to enhance craft, focus on amplifying character internal conflicts—such as Jack and Linda's personal fears and growth—to make their journeys more emotionally resonant and less formulaic. This will heighten tension and audience engagement, ensuring that the philosophical elements are not just intellectual but deeply integrated into character arcs for a more impactful narrative.
Themes

Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.

Key Suggestions:
From a creative perspective, the script masterfully uses themes of concealment and environmental risk to build tension, but to elevate its craft, focus on deepening character arcs—such as Jack's internal conflict with health risks and Linda's anxiety-driven rituals—to make the human elements more emotionally resonant and less overshadowed by procedural details. This would enhance audience engagement and thematic depth without altering the core narrative.
Logic & Inconsistencies

Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.

Key Suggestions:
The script's inconsistencies and redundancies, such as unexplained plot holes and repetitive character tics, disrupt narrative flow and character authenticity. Focusing on tightening logical gaps, like how events unfold during the raid, and streamlining motifs, such as the ventilation hum, will enhance pacing, deepen character development, and create a more immersive, believable story that better serves the thriller genre's demands for tension and realism.

Scene Analysis

All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.

Scene-Level Percentile Chart
Hover over the graph to see more details about each score.
Go to Scene Analysis

Other Analyses

Writer Exec

This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.

Unique Voice

Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.

Key Suggestions:
The writer's voice excels in creating a tense, atmospheric world through detailed descriptions and subtext-heavy dialogue, which effectively builds suspense and explores themes of secrecy and danger. To enhance the script, focus on integrating more varied character perspectives and emotional depth to balance the environmental focus, ensuring that the pervasive unease serves not just the plot but also deepens audience investment in the characters' personal stakes and moral dilemmas.
Writer's Craft

Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.

Key Suggestions:
Your screenplay excels in building tension and atmosphere, drawing viewers into a gripping narrative based on true events. To enhance it creatively, concentrate on deepening dialogue with subtext, refining pacing to keep the story dynamic, and exploring characters' internal motivations for richer emotional layers, transforming your solid foundation into a more immersive and compelling piece.
Memorable Lines
Spotlights standout dialogue lines with emotional or thematic power.
Tropes
Highlights common or genre-specific tropes found in the script.
World Building

Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.

Key Suggestions:
The script's world building masterfully uses contrasts between industrial sterility and suburban normalcy to build tension, but to elevate the craft, focus on amplifying sensory details and character-driven moments within these environments. For instance, incorporating more internal monologues or subtle physical reactions to the constant hum and radiation fears could deepen emotional resonance, making the audience feel the pervasive anxiety and moral dilemmas more acutely, thus enhancing thematic impact and character arcs.
Correlations

Identifies patterns in scene scores.

Key Suggestions:
The script demonstrates strong command of high-tension scenes that effectively build conflict and emotional depth, but it over-relies on confrontational and foreboding tones, leading to predictable pacing and underdeveloped quieter moments. To enhance craft, focus on integrating subtle conflicts, revelations, or character growth in calmer scenes to create a more balanced narrative flow, improve dialogue consistency, and foster gradual character arcs, ultimately making the story more engaging and less formulaic.
Loglines
Presents logline variations based on theme, genre, and hook.

Comparison with Previous Draft

See how your script has evolved from the previous version. This section highlights improvements, regressions, and changes across all major categories, helping you understand what revisions are working and what may need more attention.

Version Comparison Analysis
Summary of Changes
Improvements (4)
  • Premise - premiseDepth: 7.0 → 8.0 +1.0
  • Character Complexity - characterConsistency: 8.0 → 9.0 +1.0
  • Character Complexity - antagonistDevelopment: 6.0 → 7.0 +1.0
  • Visual Imagery - emotionalImpact: 7.0 → 8.0 +1.0
Areas to Review (0)

No regressions detected