The Wishing Well

When an offhand wish at an old well collides with a janitor's decades-old grief, a teenage girl must confront her town’s casual cruelty to restore memory where there has been erasure.

See other logline suggestions

Overview

Poster
Unique Selling Point

This script uniquely blends supernatural elements with real-world grief and small-town secrets, using the wishing well as both literal and metaphorical device to explore how communities process tragedy and how careless actions can reopen old wounds. The combination of 80s nostalgia with timeless themes of loss creates a distinctive tone that sets it apart from typical genre fare.

AI Verdict & Suggestions

Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.

Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries

GPT5
 Recommend
Gemini
 Consider
Claude
 Consider
Grok
 Recommend
DeepSeek
 Recommend
Average Score: 7.8
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
You have a strong, cinematic short with a memorable motif (the CLINK) and an emotionally resonant core: grief, memory and a teen’s awakening. The next draft should choose clarity over passive implication—decide whether the well/Mrs. Craven are literally supernatural or symbolic, then tighten scenes to show that logic. Cut the microfilm info‑dump into an active discovery (or fold details into Mrs. Craven’s dialogue), deepen one or two supporting characters so the town’s culpability feels earned, and give Emily a clear, costly action in the finale (something she must choose or risk) so the emotional payoff lands. Small, focused rewrites here will strengthen stakes without bloating the short’s tight structure.
For Executives:
This is a festival-ready, low-budget short with a strong visual hook and topical, festival-friendly themes (memory, small-town culpability). Its market upside is solid for drama and supernatural-leaning shorts, but current ambiguity around the supernatural rules and a passive protagonist create programming risk—judges and programmers often favor clear stakes and active agency in short form. With targeted rewrites (clarify the well’s mechanics, sharpen Emily’s agency, cut the microfilm dump) the piece can move from promising festival programmer interest to a competitive festival contender with minimal additional cost.
Story Facts
Genres:
Drama 40% Horror 30% Comedy 20% Thriller 30%

Setting: 1985, A small mill town, including a hilltop, school, library, and residential areas

Themes: The Weight of Unacknowledged Grief and Memory, Coming-of-Age and Loss of Innocence, The Supernatural and Unresolved Mysteries, The Hypocrisy and Disregard of Community

Conflict & Stakes: Emily's emotional journey as she confronts her ignorance about Mrs. Craven's past and the tragic history of the well, with stakes involving her understanding of loss and memory.

Mood: Somber and introspective with elements of nostalgia and mystery.

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The mysterious well that serves as a focal point for the children's wishes and the tragic history tied to it.
  • Plot Twist: The revelation of Mrs. Craven's husband's death and the town's complicity in the tragedy.
  • Distinctive Setting: The nostalgic 1980s mill town atmosphere that evokes a sense of timelessness and innocence.
  • Innovative Ideas: The integration of supernatural elements with real emotional stakes, blending coming-of-age themes with horror.
  • Unique Characters: The complex relationship between Emily and Mrs. Craven, highlighting themes of empathy and understanding.

Comparable Scripts: Stand By Me, The Goonies, It (2017), The Secret Garden, A Wrinkle in Time, Coraline, The Body (short story by Stephen King), The Lovely Bones, Ghost World

Script Level Analysis

Writer Exec

This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.

Screenplay Insights

Breaks down your script along various categories.

Overall Score: 7.71
Key Suggestions:
Tight, targeted revisions will pay the biggest creative dividends: deepen Tommy and Jenny with micro-moments (actions, reactions, a single revealing line or prop) that show internal conflict and growth, and tie those moments to the well motif and Emily’s arc. You don’t need new scenes — insert small beats (a hesitation, a private exchange, a visual callback) in existing scenes so their arcs feel earned and amplify the emotional payoff of the finale.
Story Critique

Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.

Key Suggestions:
The screenplay's atmosphere and emotional throughline are strong, but the impact of the final revelation would benefit from structural tightening: foreshadow Mrs. Craven earlier and deepen Emily's personal connection to the town's past so the arc feels earned. Small, concrete beats — an almost-noticed figure in the background of Scene 1, a whispered line from an older resident, or a faded family photograph that hints at the foreman — will integrate the mystery into the town's fabric and raise the stakes of Emily's discovery. Also clarify the town's collective choice to forget the accident (through a library snippet or a hushed conversation) and consider a subtle late-stage sign of Mrs. Craven's release to make the ending emotionally satisfying without losing the screenplay's eerie ambiguity.
Characters
Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.
Emotional Analysis

Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.

Key Suggestions:
The script has a compelling emotional arc — playful nostalgia that hardens into a powerful, melancholic climax — but it leans too long into sustained negative emotion, particularly in Scene 3. To strengthen audience engagement, add brief moments of emotional relief and early seeds of Mrs. Craven’s humanity (a faded photo in her window, a fleeting compassionate glance) so the final revelation lands with more nuance. Tighten and break up Scene 3 (shorten the sustained high-fear beats, insert a quiet, character-driven beat where Emily connects with a friend or shows private resilience) to improve pacing and make the emotional payoff in Scene 4 more satisfying.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.

Key Suggestions:
Tighten and dramatize Emily’s arc so her internal desire (bravery, belonging, and wish for a different family) is clearly established early and mirrored by specific external actions. Make Mrs. Craven’s grief and the foreman’s backstory more tactile—add small scenes or beats that show the town’s denial and Emily’s attempts to reconcile it—so the final ‘wish’ lands as earned rather than merely atmospheric. Small structural shifts (one or two earlier clues, a clearer obstacle to honoring the foreman, and one stronger emotional choice by Emily) will amplify payoff without changing the core tone.
Themes

Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.

Key Suggestions:
Lean into the emotional center: make Mrs. Craven’s grief the throughline and ensure every scene, image and choice of POV serves that core. Tighten the supernatural ambiguity by deciding whether Mrs. Craven is spectral or a very present, damaged woman whose presence reads like a ghost; either choice should be signaled consistently. Amplify the town’s complicity (small gestures, looks, a town ritual montage) and use the coin/clink motif as a recurring auditory and visual anchor to unify tone. Give Emily a clearer arc of responsibility — her curiosity should move from naive play to active reparative choice — and pare scenes that don't push those emotional beats forward to improve pacing.
Logic & Inconsistencies

Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.

Key Suggestions:
The screenplay's mood and emotional core are strong, but the central mechanics around the wishing well and Mrs. Craven's knowledge are unclear and create noticeable plot holes. Decide whether the well is literal magic or symbolic, then tighten beats to show how Mrs. Craven learns Emily's wish (concrete eavesdropping detail, visual cue, or earlier foreshadowing). Also soften or humanize expository lines and trim repeated sound/action motifs so character motivation and theme feel earned rather than plot-driven.

Scene Analysis

All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.

Scene-Level Percentile Chart
Hover over the graph to see more details about each score.
Go to Scene Analysis

Other Analyses

Writer Exec

This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.

Unique Voice

Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.

Key Suggestions:
You have a strong, atmospheric voice that creates mood and emotional resonance—keep that. To improve the script, tighten the narrative clarity around the central mystery and the emotional stakes: make Mrs. Craven’s backstory and its connection to Emily's wish-driven arc more explicit and give the supernatural thread a clearer, personally meaningful payoff. Practical steps: consolidate scenes that feel repetitive, sharpen key dialogue beats to reveal motive (not just mood), and ensure each supernatural moment advances Emily’s inner journey so the ending lands emotionally rather than only atmospherically.
Writer's Craft

Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.

Key Suggestions:
You have a strong gift for atmosphere, nostalgia, and quietly resonant moments. To make the script competitive, concentrate on deepening character interiority through subtext: sharpen what each character wants versus needs, let those motivations inform small actions and silences, and tighten dialogue so it consistently reveals character rather than stating emotion. Use targeted rewrites and the suggested exercises to convert evocative description into more emotionally charged, character-driven beats that build toward a clearer arc for Emily and Mrs. Craven.
Memorable Lines
Spotlights standout dialogue lines with emotional or thematic power.
Tropes
Highlights common or genre-specific tropes found in the script.
World Building

Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.

Key Suggestions:
The script has a richly textured, nostalgic world that supports a quiet, mysterious coming-of-age story. To strengthen it, tighten the causal links between setting and character: make Mrs. Craven’s grief and the well’s history affect Emily earlier and more directly, give Emily clearer agency in driving the investigation and resolution, and decide how literal the supernatural elements are so the emotional payoff lands. Small structural tweaks (reordering reveals, amplifying sensory detail at key beats, and clarifying stakes) will convert atmosphere into dramatic momentum without losing the screenplay’s melancholic tone.
Correlations

Identifies patterns in scene scores.

Key Suggestions:
Your strongest scene (Scene 4) demonstrates that when you pair an explicitly emotional tone with clearly elevated, demonstrable stakes, the script lands hardest. Lean into that formula: make emotional moments earn their weight by raising tangible personal or external consequences, and ensure dialogue always advances the plot or reveals character purpose. Tighten earlier scenes so they build toward that high-stakes emotional payoff rather than merely setting atmosphere.
Loglines
Presents logline variations based on theme, genre, and hook.