HIGH LINE

A wildlife officer haunted by a childhood mauling uncovers a dry canal's role as a covert highway for mountain lions and burglars, forcing him to destroy a headgate to flood out the threats and expose a land-grab conspiracy.

See other logline suggestions

Overview

Poster
Unique Selling Point

HIGH LINE uniquely weaponizes environmental neglect as both literal and metaphorical threat, transforming a dry irrigation canal into a hunting corridor where wildlife and human predators converge. Its genius lies in making bureaucratic water management decisions feel as dangerous as any serial killer, while exploring trauma, memory, and the consequences of severing natural systems. This isn't just a man-vs-nature thriller—it's a sophisticated critique of how human systems create the conditions for their own predation.

AI Verdict & Suggestions

Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.

Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries

GPT5
 Recommend
Claude
 Recommend
Gemini
 Consider
Grok
 Recommend
DeepSeek
 Recommend
Average Score: 8.2
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
To strengthen HIGH LINE creatively, prioritize developing the antagonists' motivations and backstories—such as Glover Thompson and Walter Dent's personal stakes in the canal shutdown—to make their schemes more believable and less archetypal. Additionally, refine mid-script pacing by tightening repetitive investigative or dream sequences and deepen emotional arcs for supporting characters like Bruce and Sean, ensuring their journeys resonate more fully and avoid feeling underdeveloped. These changes will enhance thematic coherence, character depth, and overall narrative drive, transforming a solid script into a more immersive and impactful story.
For Executives:
HIGH LINE has solid value as a mid-budget eco-thriller with festival potential and topical appeal in environmental themes, offering commercial hooks through suspenseful set pieces and a relatable family drama. However, risks include underdeveloped antagonist motivations and pacing issues that could lead to plot holes or audience disengagement, potentially resulting in mixed reviews or limited box office if not addressed. Market perception might see it as a standard thriller unless revisions sharpen its unique metaphor and emotional stakes, making it competitive in a crowded genre.
Story Facts
Genres:
Drama 40% Thriller 35% Horror 25% Crime 30% Action 15% Fantasy 10%

Setting: Contemporary, High Line Canal and surrounding suburban areas in Colorado

Themes: Human Manipulation of Nature and its Consequences, Corruption and Indifference of Power Structures, Trauma, Memory, and Familial Responsibility, The Inevitability of Natural Forces and Systems, Loss and Survival, The Nature of Truth and Perception

Conflict & Stakes: Matt's investigation into mysterious animal attacks and disappearances linked to a developer's land schemes, with the safety of his family and community at stake.

Mood: Tense and suspenseful with moments of introspection and melancholy.

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The intertwining of wildlife horror with a family drama, exploring the impact of environmental neglect.
  • Major Twist: The revelation that the canal was deliberately emptied to facilitate land acquisition, linking human greed to the animal attacks.
  • Distinctive Setting: The High Line Canal serves as a central character in the story, representing both beauty and danger.
  • Innovative Ideas: The use of wildlife as a metaphor for the consequences of human actions on the environment.
  • Unique Characters: Complex characters like Matt, who grapple with personal trauma while facing external threats.

Comparable Scripts: The Revenant, The Road, A Quiet Place, The Call of the Wild, Stand By Me, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, The Witch, The Martian, The Babadook

Script Level Analysis

Writer Exec

This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.

Screenplay Insights

Breaks down your script along various categories.

Overall Score: 8.01
Key Suggestions:
To strengthen the script's creative impact, focus on deepening the emotional arcs of secondary characters like Sean and Bruce by adding more backstory and intimate moments that reveal their struggles and growth, which will enhance audience relatability and thematic resonance. Additionally, refine pacing in drawn-out scenes, particularly in the middle act, to maintain tension and improve narrative flow, ensuring that the thriller elements build effectively without losing momentum.
Story Critique

Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.

Key Suggestions:
To strengthen this script's creative craft, prioritize refining the dialogue to eliminate expository elements and make interactions more organic, while clarifying key plot connections such as the motivations behind land purchases and the links between wildlife and criminal activities. Tightening pacing in slower sections and integrating flashbacks more seamlessly will heighten tension and emotional depth, ensuring the environmental themes and character arcs resonate more powerfully with audiences.
Characters

Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.

Key Suggestions:
The character analysis highlights strong foundations for Matt and Sean, with compelling arcs and emotional depth, but Bruce's static nature and underdeveloped backstory risk flattening the family dynamics. To enhance the script's craft, focus on deepening emotional beats in key family scenes, such as scene 12, which is consistently flagged as weak, and explore Matt's military past and Sean's anxiety triggers to create more resonant, layered interactions that drive the narrative and strengthen thematic ties to environmental and familial struggles.
Emotional Analysis

Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.

Key Suggestions:
The script's emotional core is strong in suspense and character empathy, but it suffers from a lack of variety and prolonged high-intensity sequences that could lead to audience fatigue. To improve, incorporate more diverse emotional moments, such as lighter interactions between characters and deeper connections to the environmental themes, to create a more balanced and engaging narrative that enhances character development and thematic resonance without overwhelming the viewer.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.

Key Suggestions:
The script's strong focus on philosophical conflicts like Preservation vs. Progress and character-driven goals provides a solid foundation for thematic depth, but to enhance craft, consider weaving these elements more explicitly into earlier scenes and dialogue. This would build tension gradually and make Matt's internal evolution feel more organic, ensuring that the high-stakes resolutions at 90-95% don't feel abrupt and allow for richer emotional payoffs.
Themes

Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.

Key Suggestions:
From a creative standpoint, the script's thematic depth in human-nature conflict is a strong asset, but to enhance its craft, focus on tightening the integration of personal and environmental elements. For instance, amplify Matt's character arc by making his traumatic past more subtly woven into the present-day action, avoiding heavy-handed exposition, and use Bruce's memory lapses as symbolic motifs that echo the canal's desiccation for added poetic resonance. This will create a more immersive, emotionally layered narrative that balances thriller pacing with introspective depth, potentially elevating the script's appeal without overwhelming the audience.
Logic & Inconsistencies

Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.

Key Suggestions:
The script's core strength lies in its atmospheric tension and environmental themes, but inconsistencies in character behavior, story transitions, and plot logic dilute its impact. To enhance craft, focus on tightening character arcs for better emotional resonance, resolving plot holes to maintain suspense, and streamlining redundant elements to improve pacing and clarity, ultimately creating a more cohesive and immersive narrative.

Scene Analysis

All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.

Scene-Level Percentile Chart
Hover over the graph to see more details about each score.
Go to Scene Analysis

Other Analyses

Writer Exec

This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.

Unique Voice

Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.

Key Suggestions:
The script's strength lies in its vivid sensory descriptions and emotional depth, particularly in scenes like Scene 3, which masterfully blend atmosphere with family dynamics. To improve, focus on varying pacing to prevent over-reliance on slow builds, ensuring that the thematic elements of nature's indifference and human vulnerability are woven more dynamically into action sequences, and expand on character backstories to heighten emotional stakes and avoid predictability in the mystery elements.
Writer's Craft

Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.

Key Suggestions:
The screenplay's strengths lie in its vivid imagery and emotional depth, creating immersive scenes that draw viewers in. To enhance it from a craft perspective, focus on infusing dialogue with more subtext and nuance, tightening pacing to sustain tension, developing richer character backstories for authenticity, and exploring themes more deeply to amplify moral complexities and internal conflicts, ultimately making the narrative more resonant and polished.
Memorable Lines
Spotlights standout dialogue lines with emotional or thematic power.
Tropes
Highlights common or genre-specific tropes found in the script.
World Building

Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.

Key Suggestions:
The script's world-building masterfully integrates the Colorado environment to drive themes and plot, creating a palpable sense of tension and loss. To enhance it creatively, focus on refining the balance between environmental symbolism and character-driven moments, ensuring that the canal's role as a metaphor for neglect doesn't overshadow personal stakes; this could involve adding subtle, sensory details in key scenes to heighten emotional resonance and make the story more visceral and engaging for audiences.
Correlations

Identifies patterns in scene scores.

Key Suggestions:
The script's strength lies in its suspenseful and emotional elements that drive character development and plot progression, but reflective scenes often lack conflict, leading to slower pacing that could disengage audiences. To improve, weave subtle conflicts into these introspective moments and enhance dialogue in tense scenes for deeper character revelation, ensuring a more dynamic flow and stronger emotional hooks throughout.
Loglines
Presents logline variations based on theme, genre, and hook.

Comparison with Previous Draft

See how your script has evolved from the previous version. This section highlights improvements, regressions, and changes across all major categories, helping you understand what revisions are working and what may need more attention.

Version Comparison Analysis
Summary of Changes
Improvements (4)
  • Character Complexity - characterRelatability: 7.0 → 9.0 +2.0
  • Character Complexity - characterDiversity: 6.0 → 7.0 +1.0
  • Story Structure - characterDevelopmentWithinPlot: 7.0 → 8.0 +1.0
  • Premise - premiseDepth: 7.7 → 8.0 +0.3
Areas to Review (1)
  • Character Complexity - characterConsistency: 9.0 → 8.0 -1.0